A Randomized Clinical Trial of Intravenous Methylprednisolone With 2 Protocols in Patients With Graves Orbitopathy
Author:
Li Zhangfang1ORCID, Luo Yaosheng23ORCID, Huang Quandi1, Chen Zhi1, Song Dandan1, Pan Daoyan1, Hu Shidi1, Jiang Wei1, Cai Qiuyue1, Feng Xiaoting1, Zhang Qing1, Weng Chanyan1, Zhong Qiang1, Zhao Tongfeng1, Li Chenzhong1ORCID, Zhang Tong1ORCID, Shen Jie12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University , Guangzhou, Guangdong , China 2. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People’s Hospital of Shunde) , Foshan, Guangdong , China 3. Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou, Guangdong , China
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Intravenous glucocorticoid (IVGC) is an accessible and affordable treatment for Graves orbitopathy (GO); the 4.5-g protocol is well studied, but many details of treatment protocols need to be clarified.
Objective
To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly and monthly protocol of IVGC in GO.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, observer-masked, single-center clinical trial, followed up to week 24, at the third affiliated hospital of Southern Medical University; 58 patients with active and moderate to severe GO, aged 18-60 years old, who had not received relevant treatment were included. The intervention was weekly protocol or monthly protocol of IVGC; both received a cumulative dose of methylprednisolone 4.5 g and had a duration of 12 weeks. The overall effective rate, improvement of quality of life (QOL) and signal intensity ratio (SIR) were measured.
Results
There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the 2 groups at week 12 and week 24 (86.21% vs 72.41%, P = .195; 86.21% vs 82.61%, P = .441), there was no significant difference in the improvement of clinical activity score, exophthalmos, soft tissue involvement, diplopia, and QOL. At week 24, the mean SIR and maximum SIR of the 2 groups were lower than those before treatment, and there were no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups (31.03% vs 27.59%, P = .773).
Conclusion
The efficacy and safety of the 2 protocols are comparable; the monthly protocol could be used as an alternative to the weekly protocol.
Funder
Southern Medical University Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project China Health Promotion Foundation Thyroid Research Project for Young and Middle-aged Doctors Guangdong Province key Field Research and Development Plan Project
Publisher
The Endocrine Society
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|