Five-year Outcome Between Radiofrequency Ablation vs Surgery for Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Abstract

Abstract Context Ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been considered as an alternative to surgery or active surveillance for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of RFA in comparison with surgery for unilateral multifocal PTMC. Objective This work aims to report the comparison between RFA vs surgery for unilateral multifocal PTMC over a more than 5-year follow-up period. Methods This was a retrospective study at a primary care center with a median follow-up period of 72.9 months. A total of 97 patients with unilateral multifocal PTMC were treated with RFA (RFA group, n = 44) or surgery (surgery group, n = 53). In the RFA group, patients were treated by a bipolar RFA generator and an 18-gauge bipolar RF electrode with a 0.9-cm active tip. In the surgery group, patients underwent thyroid lobectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection. Results During the follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found in disease progression (4.5% vs 3.8%; P = ≥.999), lymph node metastasis (2.3% vs 3.8%; P = ≥.999), persistent lesion (2.3% vs 0%; P = .272), and RFS rates (97.7% vs 96.2%; P = .673) in the RFA and surgery groups. Patients undergoing RFA had a shorter hospitalization (0 vs 8.0 [3.0] d; P < .001), shorter procedure time (3.5 [2.4] vs 80.0 [35.0] min; P < .001), lower estimated blood loss (0 vs 20.0 [15.0] mL; P < .001), and lower costs ($1768.3 [0.1] vs $2084.4 [1173.8]; P = .001) than those in the surgery group. The complication rate in the surgery group was 7.5%, whereas none of the RFA-treated patients experienced any complications (P = .111). Conclusion This study revealed 6-year comparable outcomes between RFA and surgery for unilateral multifocal PTMC. RFA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in selected patients with unilateral multifocal PTMC.