Cancer Outcomes Among Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Populations With Dietary and Physical Activity–based Lifestyle Interventions

Author:

Zhang Minghui1,Zucatti Kelly Pozzer2,Teixeira Paula Portal2,Correia Poliana Espíndola2,Wayerbacher Laura Fink3,Spiazzi Bernardo F2,Socal Mariana P4,Boyko Edward J5,Colpani Verônica2ORCID,Gerchman Fernando26ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD 21205 , USA

2. Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) , Porto Alegre, RS 90035-003 , Brazil

3. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) , Porto Alegre, RS 90035-003 , Brazil

4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD 21205 , USA

5. Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle , WA 98108 , USA

6. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) , Porto Alegre, RS 90035-003 , Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Context People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have higher risks of cancer incidence and death. Objective We aimed to evaluate the relationship between dietary and physical activity–based lifestyle intervention and cancer outcomes among prediabetes and T2D populations. Methods We searched for randomized controlled trials with at least 24 months of lifestyle interventions in prediabetes or T2D populations. Data were extracted by pairs of reviewers and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Descriptive syntheses were performed, and the risk of bias was assessed. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using a pairwise meta-analysis with both a random-effects model and a general linear mixed model (GLMM). Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess if current information is enough for definitive conclusions. Subgroup analysis was performed by glycemic status. Results Six clinical trials were included. Among 12 841 participants, the combined RR for cancer mortality comparing lifestyle interventions with usual care was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-1.10 using GLMM and 0.82-1.09 using random-effects model). Most studies had a low risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was moderate. TSA showed that the cumulative Z curve reached futility boundary while total number did not reach detection boundary. Conclusion Based on the limited data available, dietary and physical activity–based lifestyle interventions had no superiority to usual care on reducing cancer risk in populations with prediabetes and T2D. Lifestyle interventions focused on cancer outcomes should be tested to better explore their effects.

Funder

Research and Events Incentive Fund of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

CNPq—Brazil

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3