A New Look at Screening and Diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus

Author:

Saudek Christopher D.1,Herman William H.2,Sacks David B.3,Bergenstal Richard M.4,Edelman David5,Davidson Mayer B.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine (C.D.S.), Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287

2. Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology (W.H.H.), University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

3. Department of Pathology (D.B.S.), Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

4. International Diabetes Center (R.M.B.), Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416

5. Department of Medicine (D.E.), Division of General Internal Medicine, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705

6. Department of Internal Medicine (M.B.D.), Charles R. Drew University, Los Angeles, California 90059

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Diabetes is underdiagnosed. About one third of people with diabetes do not know they have it, and the average lag between onset and diagnosis is 7 yr. This report reconsiders the criteria for diagnosing diabetes and recommends screening criteria to make case finding easier for clinicians and patients. Participants: R.M.B. invited experts in the area of diagnosis, monitoring, and management of diabetes to form a panel to review the literature and develop consensus regarding the screening and diagnosis of diabetes with particular reference to the use of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Participants met in open session and by E-mail thereafter. Metrika, Inc. sponsored the meeting. Evidence: A literature search was performed using standard search engines. Consensus Process: The panel heard each member’s discussion of the issues, reviewing evidence prior to drafting conclusions. Principal conclusions were agreed on, and then specific cut points were discussed in an iterative consensus process. Conclusions: The main factors in support of using HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test include: 1) HbA1c does not require patients to be fasting; 2) HbA1c reflects longer-term glycemia than does plasma glucose; 3) HbA1c laboratory methods are now well standardized and reliable; and 4) errors caused by nonglycemic factors affecting HbA1c such as hemoglobinopathies are infrequent and can be minimized by confirming the diagnosis of diabetes with a plasma glucose (PG)-specific test. Specific recommendations include: 1) screening standards should be established that prompt further testing and closer follow-up, including fasting PG of 100 mg/dl or greater, random PG of 130 mg/dl or greater, or HbA1c greater than 6.0%; 2) HbA1c of 6.5–6.9% or greater, confirmed by a PG-specific test (fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance test), should establish the diagnosis of diabetes; and 3) HbA1c of 7% or greater, confirmed by another HbA1c- or a PG-specific test (fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance test) should establish the diagnosis of diabetes. The recommendations are offered for consideration of the clinical community and interested associations and societies.

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference70 articles.

1. Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues.;Harris;Diabetes Care,1993

2. Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4–7 yr before clinical diagnosis.;Harris;Diabetes Care,1992

3. The onset of NIDDM and its relationship to clinical diagnosis in Egyptian adults.;Thompson;Diabet Med,1996

4. Retinal vascular changes in pre-diabetes and prehypertension: new findings and their research and clinical implications.;Nguyen;Diabetes Care,2007

5. The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the diabetes prevention program.;Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group,2007

Cited by 322 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3