Blood Glucose Control by a Model Predictive Control Algorithm with Variable Sampling Rate Versus a Routine Glucose Management Protocol in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Hovorka Roman1,Kremen Jaromir2,Blaha Jan3,Matias Michal3,Anderlova Katerina2,Bosanska Lenka2,Roubicek Tomas2,Wilinska Malgorzata E.1,Chassin Ludovic J.1,Svacina Stepan2,Haluzik Martin2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatrics (R.H., M.E.W., L.J.C.), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TT, United Kingdom

2. 3rd Department of Medicine (J.K., K.A., L.B., T.R., S.S., M.H.), Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic

3. Department of Anesthesia (J.B., M.M.), Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract Context: Elevated blood glucose levels occur frequently in the critically ill. Tight glucose control by intensive insulin treatment markedly improves clinical outcome. Objective and Design: This is a randomized controlled trial comparing blood glucose control by a laptop-based model predictive control algorithm with a variable sampling rate [enhanced model predictive control (eMPC); version 1.04.03] against a routine glucose management protocol (RMP) during the peri- and postoperative periods. Setting: The study was performed at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital. Patients: A total of 60 elective cardiac surgery patients were included in the study. Interventions: Elective cardiac surgery and treatment with continuous insulin infusion (eMPC) or continuous insulin infusion combined with iv insulin boluses (RMP) to maintain euglycemia (target range 4.4–6.1 mmol/liter) were performed. There were 30 patients randomized for eMPC and 30 for RMP treatment. Blood glucose was measured in 1- to 4-h intervals as requested by each algorithm during surgery and postoperatively over 24 h. Main Outcome Measures: Mean blood glucose, percentage of time in target range, and hypoglycemia events were used. Results: Mean blood glucose was 6.2 ± 1.1 mmol/liter in the eMPC vs. 7.2 ± 1.1 mmol/liter in the RMP group (P < 0.05); percentage of time in the target range was 60.4 ± 22.8% for the eMPC vs. 27.5 ± 16.2% for the RMP group (P < 0.05). No severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 2.9 mmol/liter) occurred during the study. Mean insulin infusion rate was 4.7 ± 3.3 IU/h in the eMPC vs. 2.6 ± 1.7 IU/h in the RMP group (P < 0.05). Mean sampling interval was 1.5 ± 0.3 h in the eMPC vs. 2.1 ± 0.2 h in the RMP group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with RMP, the eMPC algorithm was more effective and comparably safe in maintaining euglycemia in cardiac surgery patients.

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 91 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3