Trends in Diabetes Subgroups and Their Risk for All-Cause, Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes-Specific Mortality in the US: A Data-Driven Reproducible Machine Learning Approach

Author:

Antonio-Villa Neftali Eduardo1,Fernández-Chirino Luisa2,Vargas-Vazquez Arsenio1,Bahena-López Jessica Paola1,Bello-Chavolla Omar Yaxmehen3

Affiliation:

1. MD/PhD (PECEM), Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

2. Faculty of Chemistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

3. Instituto Nacional de Geriatra, Mexico City, Mexico

Abstract

Abstract Background: Diabetes has been described as a heterogeneous entity which can be studied through data-driven subgroups (obesity related [MOD], severe-insulin deficient [SIID], severe-insulin resistant [SIRD] and age-related diabetes [MARD]). However, trends in prevalence and mortality risk are still unclear. Aims: To analyze diabetes subgroup trends and to evaluate mortality risk in the US. Methods: Data and follow-up causes of mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes specific) was collected from NHANES cycles 1999–2018. Subgroup diabetes classification was performed using the self-normalizing neural networks algorithm using clinical parameters (HbA1c, time since diabetes diagnosis, HOMA2-IR, HOMA2-B, and BMI) proposed by Bello-Chavolla et al (https://bit.ly/3jSm1xv). Prevalence was estimated using sample weights. 2-year cycles were used as a continuous variable to evaluate the biannual change (BC) of the overall prevalence of diabetes and subgroups. Trends were stratified according to race. Cox-proportional and Fine-Gray semiparametric hazard regression models were used to evaluate mortality risk. Results: Data from 59,204 adult subjects was extracted for trend analysis. Follow-up information was obtained for 3,980 subjects. Diabetes prevalence in the US increased from 8.2% (95%CI 7.8–8.6) in 1999–2000 to 13.9% (95% CI 13.4–14.4) in 2017–2018 (BC 1.38%, 95% CI 1.20–1.56, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic Blacks had the largest increase in diabetes prevalence (BC: 1.40%, 95%CI 0.71–2.08, p=0.027), followed by Non-Hispanic Whites (BC: 1.36%, 95%CI 1.13–1.58, p<0.001), and Mexican Americans (BC: 1.33%, 95%CI 1.20–1.54, p<0.001). Regarding diabetes subgroups, MARD had the highest prevalence, with a moderate increase over time; however, MOD had the greatest increase over time (1.5%, [95%CI 1.2–1.8] to 4.5% [95%CI 4.0–5.0]; BC: 0.73% [95%CI 0.60–0.86], p<0.01). Both SIRD and SIID had non-significant increases in prevalence during the studied period. Non-Hispanic Blacks had an increase in the prevalence in MOD and SIID, Mexican Americans in MOD and SIRD, and non-Hispanic Whites in MOD and MARD. Compared with MOD, the risk for all-cause mortality was higher for MARD (HR 2.9 95% CI: 2.1–3.9), SIRD (HR 2.0 95% CI: 1.5–2.8), and SIID (HR 1.6 95% CI: 1.1–2.3). For CVD mortality, only MARD (HR 2.8 95% CI: 1.4–5.7) and SIRD (HR 2.5 95% CI: 1.2–5.3) displayed higher risk. For diabetes-specific mortality, only MARD (HR 2.2 95% CI: 1.3–3.7) was associated. Conclusion: There is an overall increase in diabetes prevalence and its subgroups from 1999 to 2018; MORD had the highest increase. The risk for all-cause, CVD and diabetes-specific mortality was different among subgroups. Our results supports the use of diabetes subgroups for a better understanding of diabetes and its complications.

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3