Justification of temporary deviations from the standardized indicators of drinking water quality-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Justification of temporary deviations from the standardized indicators of drinking water quality

Published:2023-10-09 Issue:8 Volume:102 Page:868-875
ISSN:2412-0650
Container-title:Hygiene and sanitation
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Isaev Daniil S.¹^ORCID,Yeremin Gennadiy B.¹^ORCID,Mozzhuhina Natal’ya A.²^ORCID,Gribowa Xenia A.²^ORCID,Stepanyan Aleks A.¹^ORCID,Buzinov Roman V.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. North-West Public Health Research Center

2. North-West State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Abstract

the absence of a threat to health should be confirmed through a risk assessment, which is associated with methodological difficulties. Materials and methods. Health risk assessment projects from drinking water consumption of centralized drinking and household water supply systems in two settlements. The results of laboratory studies of drinking water quality using descriptive statistics methods are analyzed. The health risk assessment was carried out in accordance with the current guidelines G 2.1.10.1920–04. Results. According to the results of laboratory studies, it was found that the quality of drinking water before being supplied to the distribution network of settlement No. 1 didn`t meet the requirements of hygienic standards in terms of total hardness and strontium, settlement No. 2 – in terms of «total hardness», «dry residue», «magnesium», «bromine», «boron», while all these indicators, with the exception of total hardness exceeded the MPC by no more than an error of the determination method. In this regard, temporary deviations were justified only for the «total hardness». Non-carcinogenic risk assessment showed that the values of the hazard coefficients corresponded to the permissible level. The levels of the total carcinogenic risk by consumption of the drinking water throughout whole life and for 7 years correspond to the upper limit of acceptable risk. Limitations. The limitation was the number of laboratory test protocols selected for analysis – over a 3-year period. In addition, the limitation was the inability to evaluate the full list of indicators from the point of view of risk assessment, as well as the probabilistic nature of the results obtained. Conclusion. To justify temporary deviations in drinking water quality in terms of «total hardness», it is necessary to conduct a complete study of the concentrations of cations forming the «total hardness» indicator – magnesium, calcium, strontium, and barium using a health risk assessment.

Publisher

Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Isaev D.S., Noskov S.N., Myasnikov I.O. On the Practice of Applying the Risk Assessment Methodology when Justifying Temporary Deviations in Drinking Water Quality. In book: Hygiene, ecology and health risks in modern conditions: Materials of the XII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Internet Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists of Rospotrebnadzor with international participation [Gigiena, ekologiya i riski zdorov’yu v sovremennykh usloviyakh: Materialy ХII vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy internet-konferentsii molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Rospotrebnadzora s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem]. Moscow; 2022: 106–9. https://elibrary.ru/raxnew (in Russian)

2. Gorbanev S.A., Stepanyan A.A., Isaev D.S., Mozzhukhina N.A., Eremin G.B., Myasnikov I.O. Justification of the priority indicators choice for water quality control in aquifers. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2022; 101(8): 842–9. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-8-842-849 https://elibrary.ru/wuzokq (in Russian)

3. Zaytseva N.V., Kleyn S.V. Estimation of risk to health of the population at impact of water peroral factor of inhabitancy in conditions of large industrial centre for problems of socially-hygienic monitoring (on example of Perm). Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2009; 11(1–6): 1139–43. https://elibrary.ru/mclbpn (in Russian)

4. Isaev D.S., Mozzhukhina N.A., Eremin G.B., Gribova K.A. On the use of a risk assessment when justifying temporary deviations in the quality of drinking water. In: Current Issues of Hygiene: Electronic Collection of Scientific Works of the VIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation, Dedicated to the 75th Anniversary of the Honored Worker of Science, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor V.V. Semenov [Aktual’nye voprosy gigieny: Elektronnyy sbornik nauchnykh trudov VIII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennaya 75-letiyu z.d.n. RF, akademika RAEN, d.m.n., professora V.V. Semenovoy]. Moscow; 2023: 65–74. (in Russian)

5. Solov’ev M.Yu., Konchenko A.V., Kurashvili O.M., Mikheeva I.V. Impact of drinking water quality on the health status of the population of the cities of the Rostov region. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2009; (3): 44–6. https://elibrary.ru/musdzl (in Russian)