Affiliation:
1. F.F. Erisman Federal Research Center of Hygiene of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Abstract
An urgent task in modern conditions is to improve the existing models of occupational risk assessment to ensure the safety and health of employees, obtain and analyze objective information sufficient to develop scientifically sound management decisions on the prevention of occupational and general morbidity, reduce labour loss and preserve labour longevity. The review provides information on domestic and foreign models of occupational risk assessment, their improvement to ensure the safety and health of employees. Various models of occupational risk assessment are analyzed, both quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative methods of assessing occupational risk that causes the risk for employee health disorders associated with exposure to chemicals, dust factor, noise, and vibration. Methodological principles of various models of occupational risk assessment differ in approaches to assessment of hazard and impact. The advantages and disadvantages of domestic and foreign models of occupational risk assessment are established. This requires the development of a single unified methodology (procedure) for assessing and managing occupational risks, criteria for assessing occupational health risks of an individual and cohort (group, collective) nature. The ideas and evidence discussed in this review indicate that scientific research and professional practice on occupational risk assessment in occupational should develop towards a more holistic, health-oriented model of occupational risk assessment and management. When preparing the review, the databases Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health, CyberLeninka, RSCI were used.
Publisher
Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,General Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Peckham T.K., Baker M.G., Camp J.E., Kaufman J.D., Seixas N.S. Creating a future for occupational health. Ann. Work Expo. Health. 2017; 61(1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxw011
2. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I., eds. Occupational Risk for Workers’ Health: Handbook [Professional’nyy risk dlya zdorov’ya rabotnikov: Rukovodstvo]. Moscow: Trovant; 2003. (in Russian)
3. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I., Prokopenko L.V., Sivochalova O.V., Stepanyan I.V., Chelishcheva M.Yu., et al. Methodology to reveal and prevent diseases associated to work. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2010; (9): 1–7. (in Russian)
4. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Kuz’mina L.P., Golovkova N.P., Chebotarev A.G., Leskina L.M., Khelkovskiy-Sergeev N.A., et al. Justification of the platform of standards based on the risk’s assessment to health employees disorders of the leading sector’s enterprises of the economy. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2021; 61(3): 155–60. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-3-155-160 (in Russian)
5. Denisov E.I., Il’kaeva E.N., Prokopenko L.V., Sivochalova O.V., Stepanyan I.V., Chesalin P.V. Logic and architecture of prognostic models construction in occupational health. Byulleten’ Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo tsentra Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2009; (1): 20–9. (in Russian)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献