Affiliation:
1. Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Abstract
Introduction. The contemporary industry has a peculiarity related to impacts exerted by physical factors (a leading one is exposure to noise being higher than safe levels fixed in hygienic standards). According to the Sanitary-epidemiologic requirements No. 2.2.4.3539-16, item 3.2.6, it is necessary to assess health risks for workers who are exposed to noise ranging from 80 to 85 dB(A) at their workplaces.The aim of the study was to develop methodical approaches to quantitative assessment of risks caused by exposure to excess noise and to test them at enterprises located in Perm.Data and methods. When developing methodical approaches, we revised research works that focused on impacts exerted by noise on workers’ bodies and probable responses caused by them as well as on procedures for occupational risks assessment. When testing our approaches, we applied hygienic assessment and epidemiologic analysis procedures, and statistically analyzed data on three enterprises located in Perm (334 workers; 210 out of them were exposed to noise varying from 80 to 85 dB(A) at their workplaces).Results. We suggested the following risk assessment algorithm: creating a test group and a reference one; determining any possible relations between exposure to noise and frequency of responses from the critical body organs and systems under the Guide No. 2.2.1766-03; calculating probability and risks of occupational diseases; comparing obtained results with unacceptable risk levels. We analyzed three enterprises located in Perm and didn’t reveal any occupational diseases. The risk of occupational pathology caused by exposure to noise being higher than MPL (80-85 dB(A)) amounted to 6.4∙10-3 at the enterprise No. 3Conclusion. Suggested approaches to quantitative health risk assessment allow assessing whether exposure to noise is acceptable or not, to meet requirements fixed in the Sanitary-epidemiologic requirements No. 2.2.4.3539-16, item 3.2.6. Assessment results can give grounds for further development of preventive activities and managerial decisions aimed at preserving workers’ health.
Publisher
Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,General Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Izmerov N.F. Global plan of actions on workers’ health preservation for 2008–2017: ways and prospects of realization. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2008; 48(6): 1-9. (in Russian)
2. Berkheeva Z.M., Giniyatova A.M. Long-term dynamics and structure of occupational diseases in republic of Tatarstan. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny. 2015; 8(1): 10-7. (in Russian)
3. Shaykhlislamova E.R., Volgareva A.D., Karimova L.K., Valeeva E.T., Obukhova M.P. The role of work-related noise in the development of occupational and somatic pathology in miners. Sanitarnyy vrach. 2017; (7): 21-7. (in Russian)
4. Vasil’ev A.V. Problems of estimation of joint influence of noise and other physical factors on the human’s health. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2012; 14(6): 158-65. (in Russian)
5. Denisov E.I. Noise at a workplace: permissible noise levels, risk assessment and hearing loss prediction. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2018; (3): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2018.3.02 (in Russian)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献