Affiliation:
1. Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department
2. Moscow Department of Healthcare State
3. Consultative and Diagnostic Polyclinic №121 of the Moscow City Health Department; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
4. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Moscow Centre of Research & Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department
Abstract
Introduction. The study of public opinion as the basis for strategic planning of the activities of medical institutions is more relevant than ever, as it allows finding ways to solve the problems of ensuring the availability and satisfaction of citizens with medical care. Purpose. Comparative assessment of the availability of primary health care based on the results of a sociological study of public opinion and data from the Unified Medical Information and Analytical System of the City of Moscow (UMIAS). Material and methods. To study public opinion, the practice of population survey was used, which was conducted through direct interviewing with filling out questionnaires of visitors to Moscow polyclinics and the method of questioning doctors based on a questionnaire developed by researchers. To analyze the data, the authors used general scientific methods of cognition, including the dialectical method, a systematic approach, logical correspondence and harmonization, detailing and generalization. As part of the study, the index value of the patient loyalty to the medical institution (MI) was calculated according to Net Promoter Score (NPS) method as the difference between the share of the “Promoters” group and the share of the “Critics” group in the total number of responses. Results and discussion. The established correlations indicate the opinions of doctors and citizens to coincide and the UMIAS data on the issue of assessing the accessibility of admission of level 1 doctors for citizens. Based on the results of a sociological survey, the number of dissatisfied patients is mainly affected by managing medical care and its availability. The study confirmed that the higher the availability of an appointment with a level 1 doctor, the lower the number of visits the doctor on duty. Conclusion. The conducted research has shown the practicality of an integrated approach to evaluating the activities of medical organizations based on the results of public opinion research and UMIAS data.
Publisher
Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference16 articles.
1. Vyalkov A.I., Polesskiy V.A., Martynchik S.A. WHO’s key strategies for improving national health systems. Glavvrach. 2008; (5): 10–25. (in Russian)
2. Morgan M.W., Salzman J.G., LeFevere R.C., Thomas A.J., Isenberger K.M. Demographic, оperational and нealthcare utilization factors associated with emergency department patient satisfaction. West J. Emerg. Med. 2015; Sept., 16 (4): 516–526. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015. 4.25074. 1. (in Russian)
3. Nguyen Thi P.L., Briançon S., Empereur F., Guillemin F. Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Soc.Sci. Med. 2002 Feb.; 54 (4): 493–504. 1. (in Russian)
4. Schrop S.L. The relationship between patient socioeconomic status and patient satisfaction: Does patient-physician communication matter? Kent, USA: Kent State University. 2011: 257. 1. (in Russian)
5. Suslin S.A., Vavilov A.V., Gannatulina R.I. Satisfaction of patients of the city multidisciplinary hospital with medical care. Organizatsiya zdravookhraneniya. 2018; 5(4): 118–25. https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-4-12 (in Russian)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献