Professional models behavior of employees in the medical institutions

Author:

Alikperova Natalia V.1ORCID,Yarasheva Aziza V.2ORCID,Klyueva Svetlana F.3ORCID,Vinogradova Kristina V.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department; Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

2. Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

3. JSC «Aeroelectromash»

4. Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department

Abstract

Introduction. The choice by medical personnel of a particular trend in their professional behaviour has a direct and significant impact on the functioning of health care institutions in general. The labour behaviour of doctors and nurses is determined by many different external factors and the formed personal characteristics of the health workers themselves. The aim of the study. Identification of current models of professional behaviour of employees of the capital’s medical organizations. Material and methods. Sociological research in the form of a mass survey of doctors and nurses; multivariate data analysis using structural and logical typology (factor and cluster analysis). Results. The selection of four models of professional behaviour of employees of the capital’s medical organizations based on factor analysis (matrix of factor loadings) has been substantiated. The four models shown reflect the relationship between the personal characteristics of the personnel of healthcare institutions and working conditions (the ability to qualitatively fulfil the responsibilities for the provision of medical services and build a professional career). Discussion. The differences in the preference for behavioural trends of doctors and nurses in the workplace revealed in the study showed an uneven distribution by behavioural models: the greater importance of professional (qualification) qualities for some and personal characteristics for others. Conclusion. The systematization of behavioural models of medical personnel is in demand from the standpoint of the need to make effective management decisions in healthcare institutions in situations where it is necessary to identify and remove obstacles to achieving specific goals: increasing job satisfaction and providing quality medical care.

Publisher

Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference20 articles.

1. Vlasova O.V. On the issue of staffing a medical organization. Regional’nyy vestnik. 2020; 4(4): 91–3. (in Russian)

2. Davies H., Powell A. Managing Doctors, Doctors Managing. Research report. Nuffield Trust; 2016. Available at: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2017-01/doctors-managers-web-final.pdf

3. Yarasheva A.V., Aksenova E.I. Problems of reproduction of scientific personnel as viewed by heads of institutions. Narodonaselenie. 2017; (4): 105–13. https://doi.org/10.26653/1561-7785-2017-4-8 (in Russian)

4. Aleksandrova O.A., Yarasheva A.V., Aksenova E.I., Alikperova N.V., Nenakhova Yu.S. Senior management in Moscow healthcare: search for answers to urgent questions. Problemy sotsial’noy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny. 2019, 27(S): 522–8. https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2019-27-si1-522-528 (in Russian)

5. Korshever N.G., Pomoshnikov S.N. Making management decisions in medical organizations: Scientific rationale. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2020, 64(1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.18821/0044-197X-2020-64-1-14-21 (in Russian)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3