Affiliation:
1. Vladimir State University named after A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs
2. Vladimir State University named after A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract
Introduction. According to Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) , in 2021, the Vladimir Region took 69th place among all subjects of the Russian Federation in terms of natural population growth (loss). In terms of the frequency of general morbidity over 2010, the region was the most disadvantaged in the Central Federal District; in 2017, it was at the second place.
The purpose of the study is to analyze the medical and demographic situation in the Vladimir region during the pre‒pandemic period.
Materials and methods. The official statistical data of the Federal State Statistics Service and collections of the medical information and analytical center of the Vladimir region for 2001–2019 were used. The analysis of the main demographic indicators, as well as data on the general morbidity in children, adolescents, and adults in sixteen classes of diseases of the WHO classification (ICD-10) was carried out.
Results. The population of the Vladimir Region has decreased by 192,247 people since 2001. A significant differentiation of morbidity values is shown both by different age groups and by administrative districts.
Limitations of the study are usually related to the lack of access to detailed statistical information within administrative territories.
The peculiarities of collecting and presenting statistical information on morbidity do not allow implementing a more detailed analysis within each age group, limited to three contingents.
Conclusion. For the first time, a study of the medical and demographic situation in the Vladimir region, which developed over a nineteen-year pre-pandemic period, made it possible to establish risk territories with characteristic features of their health status.
Publisher
Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman
Reference22 articles.
1. Kazak A.A., Shaykhlislamova E.R., Yamaliev A.R., Valeeva E.T., Sandakova I.V., Galimova R.R., et al. Hygienic approaches to the assessment of occupational morbidity in the Republic of Bashkortostan in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2022; (6): 425–36. https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco106186 https://elibrary.ru/lzkqun (in Russian)
2. Bezruchko E.V. The right to safety of human health as the object of criminal law protection. Yurist”-Pravoved”. 2013; (5): 47‒50. https://elibrary.ru/sesbsf (in Russian)
3. Zorina I.G., Makarov V.V. Social and hygienic monitoring as the basis of a control in the control and supervisory activities of the federal service for surveillance on consumer rights protection and human wellbeing. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2020; 99(1): 13‒9. https://doi.org/10.33029/0016-9900-2020-99-1-13-19 https://elibrary.ru/gfgzdb (in Russian)
4. Savilov E.D., Brino N.I., Kolesnikov S.I. Epidemiological aspects of environmental problems of the present. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2020; 99(2): 134‒9. https://doi.org/10.33029/0016-9900-2020-99-2-134-139 https://elibrary.ru/nfaexb (in Russian)
5. Potapov A.I., Novichkova N.I., Chistyakova T.V., Parkhomenko V.V. Prevention and rehabilitation are effective areas to improve population health. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012; (1): 3–5. https://elibrary.ru/opfdll (in Russian)