Accessibility of medical care in the public and private sectors of healthcare (based on the results of a sociological survey of the population of the Vologda region)

Author:

Kalashnikov Konstantin N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Science

Abstract

Introduction. In the Vologda region healthcare there are complex management and economic (acute shortage of doctors) and spatial (large territory, complex settlement system) restrictions on the availability of medical care. The private health sector is an alternative to the public sector, but it expands the burden of public spending. This actualizes research aimed at assessing the availability of medical care in both sectors of the industry. Purpose of the study. Assessment of the availability of medical care for the population of the Vologda region in the public and private sectors. Materials and methods. The toolkit is a questionnaire survey of the population (sample consisted of 1,500 people) conducted in the region in 2018 and 2020. The analysis is carried out by means of the distribution of respondents’ estimates, expressed in specific weights of the total amount of responses, in the comparative context of demographic and territorial groups, the public and commercial sectors of the industry. The integral index of accessibility of medical care is proposed and tested. Results. Respondents estimate the availability of medical care/services in private medical institutions higher than in public ones (the accessibility index (AI), in 2020 was 179.6 and 163.4, respectively). During the study period, the index increased, but the gap between sectors remained. The lowest subjective estimates of accessibility were received by medical care in rural areas (AI for the public sector — 167.8, private — 179.5) and in Cherepovets (AI accounted of, respectively, 148.1 and 151.4). The highest level of accessibility was found in small towns (AI was 177.6 and 194.8). Limitations. When studying the availability of medical care in the region, 1,500 questionnaires were evaluated, which represents a sufficient reference sample to solve the tasks set. Conclusion. The study allowed obtaining valuable results, which, along with the developed tools (in particular, the index of accessibility of medical care), are recommended to the authorities for monitoring the situation in the healthcare of the region.

Publisher

Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3