Organizational and economic aspects of standardization of processes in the healthcare system

Author:

Russkikh Sergey V.1ORCID,Lindenbraten Alexander L.2ORCID,Moskvicheva Liudmila I.3ORCID,Vasilieva Tatyana P.2ORCID,Smbatyan Siran M.2ORCID,Gorbacheva Nataliya A.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department

2. N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health

3. Р. Hertsen Moscow Scientific Research Institute of Oncology of the Hertsen Federal Medical Research Centre

4. N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; Lipetsk Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Abstract

Introduction. Nowadays standardization is a necessary tool for timely response to challenges and changes, the basis for the work on patient safety, contributes to the control of staff performance, minimizes the risks of medical care. Objective. to reveal the managing and economic aspects of standardization of processes in the healthcare system and the correctness of the use of existing regulatory documents as an algorithm for the main processes at the level of structure, at the level of process, at the level of result. Materials and methods. By conducting surveys and in-depth interviews, various opinions on the standards of medical care of various interviewed groups were collected: undergraduates of the HSE course “Management and Economics of Healthcare”, as well as groups of territorial fund of compulsory medical insurance medical experts and “high-level” experts. Results. The materials of the sociological survey showed a lack of knowledge, uncertainty and unpreparedness of respondents on the application of standards in the planning and provision of medical care, which indicates a lack of understanding of the use of standardization mechanisms in improving medical care. At the same time, in-depth interviews with “high-level” experts show this management tool to operate. Limitations. The research materials are limited to the results of a survey of two groups of respondents (78 people) conducted over the period from 09.2022 to 01.2023. Conclusion. The standards can be successfully used in medical care planning, pricing, examinations, as well as training and training of medical personnel. In this regard, it should be concluded that there is a need for further training on the issues of professional development of a wide range of healthcare managers, as well as in the process of training specialists at all levels. As part of the recommendations, it is advisable to provide training for medical personnel on standardization issues, including connection with the examination of the quality and safety of medical care. To develop a methodological approach to improve and use the principle of standardization in the management and provision of medical care.

Publisher

Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference25 articles.

1. Mosadeghrad A.M. Strategic collaborative quality management and employee job satisfaction. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2014; 2(4): 167–74. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2014.38

2. Lindenbraten A.L. Health and Health Care: Thoughts Serious and Not So Serious [Zdorov’e i zdravookhranenie: mysli ser’eznye i ne ochen’]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. (in Russian)

3. Naygovzina N.B., Filatov V.B., Borozdina O.A., Nikolaeva N.A. Standardization in Healthcare. Overcoming Contradictions in Law, Practice and Ideas [Standartizatsiya v zdravookhranenii. Preodolenie protivorechiy zakonodatel’stva, praktiki, idey]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. (in Russian)

4. Ovechkina T.D., Yuldashev O.R., Kaputskaya T.N., Paley S.M. Repeated analysis of quality management system using sociological survey in order to define areas of improvement. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora. 2017; (2): 72–9. https://elibrary.ru/ypnfpr (in Russian)

5. Orlova E.M. Automated system of medical and economic standards as a way to improve the efficiency of regional healthcare management. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2010; (2): 152–5. https://elibrary.ru/ltzrzr (in Russian)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3