Abstract
The paper proposes a legal framework to evaluate emerging FinTech methodology based on alternative data and machine learning to score borrowers. Instead of conventional variables, novel methods rely on information gathered from social networks, “digital footprints”, mobile phones or GPS data. Correlating these with repayment of loans is promoted as triggering precise predictions of probability of default. Borrowers profit if their profile falls outside of classic scoring checks but performs well under the new regime. Borrowers are disadvantaged if the new methods entail disparate impact for groups which are protected under anti-discrimination laws. Additionally, data may be collected without their consent or used in a way they don’t understand.
Two contributions to the debate are submitted. Firstly, a comparative assessment of EU and U.S. data protection and anti-discrimination laws suggests what might qualify as responsible A.I.-based scoring. Secondly, public and private enforcement mechanisms are explained
Artificial Intelligence, Credit Scoring, Biased A.I., GDPR, Discriminative Lending Practices, A.I. compliance, Scoring and Banking Regulation, ECOA, FCRA, FICO score
Publisher
Kluwer Law International BV
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Implications of Algorithmic Bias in Financial Services;Advances in Finance, Accounting, and Economics;2024-04-15
2. Insurance Law and AI;The Cambridge Handbook of Private Law and Artificial Intelligence;2024-03-28
3. Corporate and Commercial Law;The Cambridge Handbook of Private Law and Artificial Intelligence;2024-03-28
4. The Effect of AI-Enabled Credit Scoring on Financial Inclusion: Evidence from One Million Underserved Population;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024
5. Risiken und Gefahren der ‚Künstlichen‘ ‚Intelligenz‘;Künstliche Intelligenz, Mensch und Gesellschaft;2024