Abstract
After five years from becoming fully operative, Regulation No 1/2003 reveals its potentialin terms of effectiveness. However, the shift towards an ex post, decentralised system of controlwas not accompanied by a ban on multiple prosecutions and parallel application of Union and National antitrust lawsis admitted. This article explores the potential violations of the principle of non bis in idem in the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU considering the newly binding EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the envisaged accession to the European Convention on Human Rights. The review carried out herein singles out five distinct scenarios and a number of deficiencies which may ultimately require amendments to the existing rules.
Publisher
Kluwer Law International BV
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union;Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems;2023
2. Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights;Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems;2023