Abstract
This article compares the quarantine model of criminal justice advocated by Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso with the corrections model of criminal justice advocated by Michael Corrado. Both of these theories are grounded on the presumption that persons lack desert-grounding free will. It is argued that on this presumption there is no reason to believe that Michael Corrado’s corrections model is any better than the quarantine model.
Reference28 articles.
1. Caruso G.D. (2016), “Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Behavior: A Public Health-Quarantine Model,” Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (1): 25–48.
2. Caruso G.D. (2021), Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice, Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. Corrado M. (2013), “Why Do We Resist Hard Incompatibilism? Thoughts on Freedom and Punishment,” [in:] The Future of Punishment, T. Nadelhoffer (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York: 79–104.
4. Corrado M.L. (2017), “Criminal Quarantine and the Burden of Proof,” Philosophia 46: 1095–1110 (pre-reviewed version of a paper to be published), URL = http://ssrn.com/abstract=3046186 [Accessed 29.11.2023].
5. Corrado M.L. (2018), “The Takings Doctrine and the Principle of Legality,” [in:] The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment, F. Focquaert et al. (eds.) (pre-review version of a chapter in UNC Legal Studies Research Paper), URL = https://ssrn.com/abstract=3303509 [Accessed 29.11.2023].