A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Adolescents’ Beliefs About the Causes of Depression

Author:

Ahuvia Isaac,Chen Sharon,Gordon Lucy,Fox Kathryn,Schleider Jessica L.ORCID

Abstract

Background: Adolescents’ beliefs about what causes depression may inform their attempts to manage the disorder and, consequently, their clinical outcomes. However, research is needed to articulate what these beliefs are and how they relate to other clinical constructs. Methods: This study explored the causal beliefs about depression held by a sample of U.S. adolescents with elevated depression symptoms (N = 281). Qualitative methods were used to identify causal beliefs from open-ended survey responses. Quantitative methods compared the perceived causes of one’s own depression vs others’ depression, compared causal beliefs across groups, and measured the association between causal beliefs and additional clinical constructs. Results: The most common causal beliefs were dysfunctional home and family relationships (52%) and stress from school (42%). Several causal beliefs were expressed more in regards to one’s own depression than others’ depression (e.g., adverse childhood events, 11% vs 3%, p = .004) and vice versa (e.g., social media use, 12% vs 2%, p < .001). Additionally, significant relationships emerged between certain causal beliefs and demographic and clinical variables. Limitations: This study did not examine behavioral indicators of illness management (e.g., help-seeking) and cannot speak to the relationship of causal beliefs to these behaviors. Moreover, as causal beliefs were measured dichotomously, we were unable to measure the degree of agreement with each belief. Conclusions: Adolescents’ causal beliefs about depression are diverse and multifaceted. The causal beliefs endorsed about one’s own depression differ substantially from those endorsed about depression generally, and both types of causal beliefs are associated with additional clinical variables.

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3