Reply to Knox and Mummolo: Critique of Johnson et al. (2019)

Author:

Johnson David Jeffrey,Cesario Joseph

Abstract

Recently we published a report showing that officer race did not predict the race of a civilian shot and, additionally, there was no evidence of anti-Black racial disparities among those fatally shot by police (Johnson, Tress, Burkel, Taylor, & Cesario, 2019). In response, Knox and Mummolo (2019) produced a critique of this work centering around two main issues: (1) The informational value of the analysis by Johnson et al. (2019); (2) The misleading nature of the quantity calculated by Johnson et al. (2019). In what follows we address each of these points, arguing that point 1 is largely an issue of debate on which reasonable people will disagree, and showing that point 2 holds only for implausible states of the world, i.e., it is unlikely to apply in most cases given actual crime rates across different racial groups. Thus the original findings, as described in that manuscript, largely stand unchanged.

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3