Abstract
The practice of substantiating projects for organizing passenger transportation both in Russia and abroad shows that these projects are unprofitable or unprofitable in terms of financial results. As a rule, due to their social significance, such projects do not allow setting prices for the finished product, ensuring that the received income exceeds the amount of invested funds. At the same time, both in Russia and abroad, projects for organizing passenger transportation are necessary, since their implementation ensures mobility, transport accessibility and other components that characterize the high quality of life of people. Therefore, when justifying projects for organizing passenger transportation, the emphasis in terms of their efficiency is most often shifted from determining direct effects (additional income, cost savings, profit) to obtaining indirect effects, the essence of which boils down to monetizing those results of projects that do not fall into the sphere of direct effects. those. in monetary terms, individual benefits of projects, reflecting various benefits for external and internal project participants, future owners of its results and other stakeholders, called stakeholders in project management. Depending on the circle of persons interested in the project, the attitude of state authorities also depends, without whose financial participation it is practically impossible to implement any project on the organization of passenger transportation today. The article discusses an approach to substantiating the effectiveness of projects for organizing passenger transportation in water transport, focused on identifying indirect effects, with specific examples showing the possible ranges of calculated effects in relation to the practice of water passenger transport enterprises.
Publisher
Volga State University of Water Transport
Reference20 articles.
1. Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 01.04.1996 г. № 440 «О Концепции перехода Российской Федерации к устойчивому развитию» [Электронный ресурс]- Режим доступа: http://government.ru/docs/all/17992/ (дата обращения: 02.02.2020).
2. Bachok, S. Passenger’s Aspiration towards Sustainable Public/ S.Bachok, M.M. Osman, Z.Ponrahono // Transportation System: Kerian District, Perak, Malaysia // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 153.-2014. p. 553 – 565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.088
3. Лавриненко П.А. Транспортная инфраструктура и экономический рост / П.А. Лавриненко, П.А. Чистяков и др., – Москва: Перо, 2019. – 142 с.
4. Korczak, J. The concept of sustainable development of public passenger transport in Koszalin/ J.Korczak, K.Kijewska, K. //Transportation Research Procedia Vol 16.- 2016.-p. 217 – 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.021
5. Aparicio, А. Exploring the sustainability challenges of long-distance passenger trends in Europe// Transportation Research Procedia Vol 13.- 2016.-p. 90 – 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献