Abstract
Among undergraduates in a carefully controlled design, 9 students who took notes studied longer than groups of 30 and 17 who did not. No differences were observed on test scores, retention interval, comprehension scores, or reading rate. Whether students expected multiple-choice or free-recall testing, strategies were similar, suggesting study oriented to rote learning.
Subject
Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference8 articles.
1. A normative study of students’ reported preferred study techniques
2. Bloom B. S. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook: I. The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
3. Reading Strategies Training for Meaningful Learning from Prose
4. Feldt R. C. (1989) College students’ study strategies, metacognitive awareness, and recall of content-area prose. (Manuscript submitted for publication)
5. Verbal-Report Data on Reading Strategies
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献