Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University
Abstract
This paper is the second of a series intended to relate Ferdinand Toennies' distinction between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft (and all comparable distinctions in social theory) to the difference between (1) intuitional and inferential role-taking (or empathy), (2) Erlebnis and Erfahrung experience, and (3) Rorschach movement and form responses. This one treats David Bakan's “communion-agency” dichotomy as a variation on the Toennies-type theme.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Toward a Psychology of Charisma: III. Intuitional Empathy, Vorbilder, Fuehrers, Transcendence-Striving, and Inner Creation;Psychological Reports;1977-06
2. Toward an Anthropology of Dogmatism: II. Traditionalism, Modernism, Existentialism, and the Counter Culture: All in the Family;Psychological Reports;1971-12
3. Toward an Anthropology of Dogmatism: Maladjustment, Modernization, and Martin Luther King;Psychological Reports;1970-10
4. Gemeinschaft, Inner Creation, and Role-Taking (Empathy): III. Charles Horton Cooley on “Social” vs “Spatial” (“Material”) Knowledge;Psychological Reports;1970-02