Affiliation:
1. University of Cincinnati
Abstract
The present study examined the cheating behavior in competitive and noncompetitive situations of 40 college students classified as Type A (16 women, 24 men) and 40 as Type B (19 women, 21 men). Type A-scoring students were more likely to cheat than Type B-scoring students irrespective of competition. The results suggest that in some situations, especially where expectations for success cannot be met, Type A-scoring students may cheat to achieve success.
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Abrupt academic dishonesty: Pressure, opportunity, and deterrence;The International Journal of Management Education;2023-07
2. Reframing and Broadening Adversarial Stylometry for Academic Integrity;Handbook of Academic Integrity;2023
3. Reframing and Broadening Adversarial Stylometry for Academic Integrity;Handbook of Academic Integrity;2023
4. Cheating;Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior;2022
5. Academic Integrity of Tourism Students;Measurement Methodologies to Assess the Effectiveness of Global Online Learning;2022