Abstract
Two predictions derived from Ellis's (1963) stimulus trace (st) deficit theory were tested with equal CA (approximately 9 years) normal and retarded children in a digit recall task. Length of recall interval (0 vs 8 sec.) and intensity level of the aurally presented items (55 vs 90 db) were varied factorially. All of the material was taped and received by subjects through earphones. Contrary to Ellis's theoretical predictions, the two IQ groups demonstrated parallel retention functions, and the performance of neither group was affected by the intensity manipulation.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献