Judgment of Filled and Unfilled Durations: Intersensory Factors

Author:

Goldstone Sanford1,Goldfarb Joyce Levis1

Affiliation:

1. Baylor University College of Medicine and Houston State Psychiatric Institute

Abstract

Previous studies have shown a consistent intersensory difference in absolute judgments of the duration of continuous auditory and visual inputs. More visual than auditory clock time was judged equivalent to specific temporal concepts. Two experiments investigated this intersensory phenomenon further by comparing the judgments of filled auditory and visual durations with the estimation of unfilled intervals bounded by discrete lights and sounds. Auditory durations were judged longer than visual for the filled and unfilled conditions, and filled auditory durations were judged longer than unfilled auditory intervals The intersensory difference in time judgment was independent of stimulus pattern while the filled-unfilled difference was dependent upon sense mode, order effects and internal temporal standard. Stimulus properties must be considered when interpreting the results of time judgment research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Children and adults rely on different heuristics for estimation of durations;Scientific Reports;2023-01-19

2. Filled-Duration Illusions;Timing & Time Perception;2021-06-07

3. Exploring Auditory Information to Change Users' Perception of Time Passing as Shorter;Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2020-04-21

4. Temporal reproduction within and across senses: Testing the supramodal property of the pacemaker-counter model.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance;2019-09

5. Filled and empty motor reproductions of filled and empty intervals: Is there also a filled - reproduction illusion?;Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics;2017-07-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3