Affiliation:
1. VA Medical Center, Gulfport, MS
Abstract
Vestewig and Moss, in attacking the validity of graphology, have attacked the present writer's statistical interpretations, which are herein defended. These authors have also attacked this writer's experimental conceptualizations, which are also defended. They have further argued against the presence of a built-in handicap of Graphoanalysts in the Vestewig, et al. experiment, interpreted as against graphology, which this writer shows to be an inadequate argument.
Subject
Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Graphology;Handwriting Identification;1999-04-15