Probing Collinearity Bias in the Close Induction Field

Author:

Greene Ernest1,Nelson Brian1

Affiliation:

1. University of Southern California Neuropsychology Foundation, Los Angeles

Abstract

The substrates of the Poggendorff illusion can be evaluated using as few as two line segments, a test segment whose collinearity is judged, and an induction segment which serves to bias that judgment. Previous research from this laboratory has shown that a very short induction segment can produce a substantial bias of perceived collinearity when it is centered at the tip of the test segment, and there is some evidence that the symmetry of this configuration affects the strength of this bias. Four experiments were conducted to clarify the issue of symmetry in the stimulation of the “half-field” zones which lie on each side of the tip. That Exp. la showed displacements which moved the induction segment to an eccentric position, i.e., occupying a single half-field, reduced collinearity error. With additional displacement which produced a gap there was a rebound of induction effect. Exp. lb indicated that an eccentric induction segment does not produce the usual strength or pattern of bias as a function of its orientation relative to the test segment. Exp. 2a suggested that the strength of induction effect is a function of symmetry within the half-fields rather than the lengths of the segments per se. Finally, in Exp. 2b the strength of induction was a joint function of the position of a short segment within one half-field and the length of another segment which stimulated the other half-field. The effect showed a complex oscillation with changes in position. We discuss the induction mechanism as beginning with “contour filters” which register the induction segment(s) and which combine their responses on the basis of “tandem activation” of the close half-fields.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3