Effects of Sex of Subject, Sex of Interrupter, and Topic of Conversation on the Perceptions of Interruptions

Author:

Chambliss Catherine A.1,Feeny Norah1

Affiliation:

1. Ursinus College

Abstract

This study examined how interruptions (violations in turn taking) are perceived and whether perceptions of interrupters vary by sex of the interrupter, sex of the subject, and the topic (stereotypical male and female topics) of a conversation. Subjects listened to a 21/2-min. audiotape of a conversation and rated the conversants on masculinity, femininity, traditionality, assertiveness, and sociability. Subjects also responded, with ratings, to seven statements related to the conversation and the feelings of the conversants toward one another. Analysis indicated that sex of the subject significantly affects perceptions of the interruption. Regardless of the sex of the interrupter and the topic of the conversation, men had more positive attitudes toward the interrupting than the women. Both sexes rated same sex interrupters more negatively than those of the opposite sex.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An Experiment on How Naïve People Evaluate Interruptions as Effective, Unpleasant and Influential;Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges;2019-09-19

2. The practice and perception of unexpected topic switching in Mandarin Chinese;Acta Linguistica Academica;2019-06

3. Which criteria do naïve people use for identifying and evaluating different kinds of interruptions?;Journal of Pragmatics;2018-12

4. Perceptions of extended concurrent speech in Mandarin;Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA);2017-02-06

5. Overcoming Impasses in Conversations: A Creative Business;Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications;2016-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3