Abstract
Two studies examine the use of personal space by persons in interactions involving stigmatized individuals. In the first, responses on a figure-placement task and on an attitude questionnaire are compared. In the second, interactions involving a person believed to have epilepsy are examined in regard to both initial interaction distance and eye contact. The expectation that the ascription of epilepsy to a stranger will result in less proximate interaction than in the case in which epilepsy is not ascribed to the stranger is supported. Degree of eye contact, however, was found not to differ for stigmatized and non-stigmatized interactions.
Cited by
96 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Physical distancing and the perception of interpersonal distance in the COVID-19 crisis;Scientific Reports;2021-06-01
2. Interpersonal Distance in the SARS-CoV-2 Crisis;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2020-09-09
3. The Evolutionary and Existential Origins of Ableism;Ableism;2019-08-30
4. The Object Orientation Effect in Exocentric Distances;Frontiers in Psychology;2018-08-03
5. Environmental Stress;Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research;2016-08-13