Differences in Visual Sensitivity among Mindfulness Meditators and Non-Meditators

Author:

Brown Daniel1,Forte Michael1,Dysart Michael1

Affiliation:

1. Cambridge Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Abstract

Tachistoscopic presentation of light flashes was used to test for differences in visual sensitivity among 3 groups of practitioners of Buddhist mindfulness meditation and non-meditator-controls. Meditation practitioners were able to detect light flashes of shorter duration than the non-meditators. There were no differences among the meditator groups. There were no differences among the groups in ability to discriminate between closely spaced successive light flashes. The lower detection threshold for single light flashes for the meditators may reflect an enduring increase in sensitivity, perhaps the long-term effects of the practice of mindfulness meditation on certain perceptual habit patterns. The lack of significant differences in the discrimination of successive light flashes probably reflects the resistance of other perceptual habit patterns to modification. The results support the statements found in Buddhist texts on meditation concerning the changes in perception encountered during the practice of mindfulness.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mindfulness and time perception: A systematic integrative review;Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews;2024-07

2. Mindfulness Is in the Eye of the Machine;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

3. Developing Emotional Intelligence: Approbation of a Coaching Program with Meditation Using Information and Communication Technologies;2023 IEEE 24th International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM);2023-06-29

4. Reducing Choice-Blindness? An Experimental Study Comparing Experienced Meditators to Non-Meditators;European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education;2022-11-06

5. Clarifying Internally-Directed Cognition: A Commentary on the Attention to Thoughts Model;Psychological Inquiry;2022-10-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3