On the Validity of the Portable Rod-and-Frame Test-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Validity of the Portable Rod-and-Frame Test

Published:1971-04 Issue:2 Volume:32 Page:434-434
ISSN:0031-5125
Container-title:Perceptual and Motor Skills
language:en
Short-container-title:Percept Mot Skills

Author:

Irving Doug¹,Henderson Don¹

Affiliation:

1. Rice University

Abstract

Kato (1965) and Morris (1967) have reported correlations between stationary Rod-and-frame Tests (RFT; Witkin, Lewis, Hertzman, Machover, Meissner, & Wapner, 1954) and portable versions of their own design of .77 and .74, respectively. However, Vaught (1969) reports a correlation between a commercially available version and a stationary RFT of .44 for men, .41 for women, and .46 over-all.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.1971.32.2.434

Reference6 articles.

1. THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF NEW ROD FRAME TEST

2. The Rod-and-Frame Test: Some Comments on Methodology

3. The Rod-and-Frame Box: A Portable Version of the Rod-and-Frame Test

4. Correlations between Scores for a Portable RFT and a Stationary RFT

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Construct validity of perceptual style: Role of stimulus size in the embedded-figures test and the rod-and-frame test;Perception & Psychophysics;1982-03

2. Eye Color as a Determinant of Field Dependence—Independence;Perceptual and Motor Skills;1977-02

3. Reliability and Trend for Field Independence as Measured by the Portable Rod-and-Frame;Perceptual and Motor Skills;1977-02

4. The Rod-and-Frame Test: Further Comments on Methodology;Perceptual and Motor Skills;1973-04