Abstract
Background and purpose
This study aims to determine the effect of interaction between shooting training in terms of ball position and foot eye coordination on football shooting accuracy.
Material and methods
The determination of the research method can be influenced by the object of research. In this study, the method chosen was the experimental method. Data preparation in this study was carried out using a 2x2 factorial research design framework. This research aims to compare two different treatments of research subjects by applying factorial design techniques. The choice of the experimental method is considered an appropriate approach because this method involves a series of trials that include an initial test, a practice session, and ends with a final test to evaluate the results. Data collection required for this research was carried out at the UPTD SPNF SKB Salatiga football field located at Jl. Soekarno Hatta, Cebongan, Argomulyo District, Salatiga City, Central Java Province. This research was conducted over a 6 week period in February - March 2024, on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays. The training duration for each meeting is 90 minutes, with a schedule of 15.30-17.00 on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, and 14.30-16.00 on Fridays. The total number of meetings reached 16 times, excluding the initial and final tests.
Results
Players who have high ankle coordination who get a stationary ball training method, have an average shooting accuracy of 15.10. While players who have high ankle coordination and get a moving training method have an average shooting accuracy of 11.20. Players who have low foot-eye coordination who get the moving ball training method have an average shooting accuracy in soccer games of 9.20. Players who have low foot-eye coordination and get a stationary ball training method have an average shooting accuracy result of 8.80.
Conclusions
There is an interaction between training methods and ankle coordination on the results of shooting accuracy in soccer games. In players who have high ankle coordination and get a stationary ball training method gives the effect of better results than players with low ankle coordination. Players of the moving ball training method with low ankle coordination give the effect of better results than the stationary ball training method.
Publisher
Independent publisher Zhanneta Kozina