Cost effectiveness of non‐drug interventions that reduce nursing home admissions for people living with dementia

Author:

Jutkowitz Eric123,Pizzi Laura T.45,Shewmaker Peter1,Alarid‐Escudero Fernando6,Epstein‐Lubow Gary178,Prioli Katherine M.4,Gaugler Joseph E.9,Gitlin Laura N.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice Brown University School of Public Health Providence Rhode Island USA

2. Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports Providence Rhode Island USA

3. Evidence Synthesis Program Center Providence VA Medical Center Providence Rhode Island USA

4. Center for Health Outcomes Policy, and Economics (HOPE) Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers University New Brunswick New Jersey USA

5. ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research Lawrenceville New Jersey USA

6. Department of Health Policy School of Medicine, and Stanford Health Policy Freeman‐Spogli Institute for International Studies Stanford University Stanford California USA

7. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

8. Butler Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA

9. Division of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health Minneapolis Minnesota USA

10. College of Nursing and Health Professions Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONSix million Americans live with Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD), a major health‐care cost driver. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of non‐pharmacologic interventions that reduce nursing home admissions for people living with AD/ADRD.METHODSWe used a person‐level microsimulation to model the hazard ratios (HR) on nursing home admission for four evidence‐based interventions compared to usual care: Maximizing Independence at Home (MIND), NYU Caregiver (NYU); Alzheimer's and Dementia Care (ADC); and Adult Day Service Plus (ADS Plus). We evaluated societal costs, quality‐adjusted life years and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios.RESULTSAll four interventions cost less and are more effective (i.e., cost savings) than usual care from a societal perspective. Results did not materially change in 1‐way, 2‐way, structural, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.CONCLUSIONDementia‐care interventions that reduce nursing home admissions save societal costs compared to usual care. Policies should incentivize providers and health systems to implement non‐pharmacologic interventions.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3