Author:
DROBNIS ERMA Z.,ZHONG CHANG Q.,OVERSTREET JAMES W.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The following methods were evaluated for their ability to separate motile cryopreserved sperm from semen after thawing: single washing, Percoll separation followed by a single washing, and Sephadex column separation. For Sephadex separation, washing, and Percoll separation, percent recovery of motile sperm was 65%, 76%, and 28%, and motility was 81%, 39%, and 60%, respectively. Percoll separation and washing were the best methods for removing seminal constituents, but sperm velocity and linearity were lower after Percoll separation and washing than after Sephadex separation. During 3 hours of incubation, there was an additional decrease in the motility, viability (exclusion of supravital dye), velocity, linearity, and intact acrosomes of Percoll‐separated sperm, indicating that Percoll separation may not be suitable for cryopreserved sperm. Motile, washed sperm also had lower velocities and higher spontaneous acrosome reactions than Sephadex‐separated sperm, but velocity and linearity were maintained during incubation. When semen was separated with Sephadex followed by washing, motility was well maintained (84%). The Sephadex method is a promising technique for selecting and concentrating motile cryopreserved sperm.
Subject
Urology,Endocrinology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献