Non‐invasive prenatal screening: Testing motivations and decision making in the low‐risk population

Author:

Lea Jenna K.12ORCID,Stevens Blair K.13,Mulligan Shannon13,Hashmi Syed S.14,Lunstroth Rebecca5,Choates Meagan G.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Houston Texas USA

2. Department of Neurology The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston Texas USA

4. Department of Pediatrics McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston Texas USA

5. McGovern Center for Humanities & Ethics McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractNon‐invasive prenatal screening provides a risk assessment for aneuploidies by utilizing cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). It is recommended that cell‐free DNA screening (cfDNA screening) be offered to all pregnant people regardless of a priori risk for aneuploidy. In the absence of an increased risk, alternative motives for electing cfDNA screening and different levels of informed decision making may arise. Therefore, our study aimed to characterize low‐risk patients' motivations for cfDNA screening election, determine how often informed decisions are being made, and compare motivations between informed and uninformed decision makers. A survey that included a modified, validated measure of informed choice (MMIC) and questions to assess patients' motivations for cfDNA screening was offered at four MFM clinics following genetic counseling. It was found that 44% of participants (n = 100) made an uninformed decision about testing. Participants with private insurers were 4.25 times more likely to make an informed decision (95% CI = 1.10–16.37). Informed decision makers scored avoiding invasive procedures higher (p = 0.007) and ranked doing what family/friends desire lower (p = 0.005) than uninformed decision makers. While most participants scored receiving information about genetic conditions highest, 12% of participants reported fetal sex disclosure as a priority. However, this was not found to be associated with uninformed decision making. This study ultimately established that following genetic counseling, a low‐risk population shared motivations with high‐risk populations which highlights the importance of complete pre‐test counseling for all. Future research should investigate the effect of modifying variables, such as socioeconomic status, on the performance of informed choice measures and critically evaluate the parameters that determine informed choice.

Funder

National Society of Genetic Counselors

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3