Affiliation:
1. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) Mexico City Mexico
2. Direction of Access to Justice at the General Unit of Scientific Knowledge and Human Rights Mexican Supreme Court Mexico City Mexico
Abstract
AbstractIn September 2021, the Mexican Supreme Court issued a decision disallowing any federal or local judicial authority to indict someone for the offense of voluntary or consensual abortion. This decision also declared unconstitutional penalties imposed on medical personnel who facilitate or assist such procedures. Furthermore, the Court decided that limiting access to abortion in cases of rape to a specific time frame was disproportionate. Later on, in September 2023, the Supreme Court confirmed that absolute criminalization of abortion was unconstitutional and declared that the rule supporting criminalization in the Federal Penal Code was without effects. Consequently, healthcare providers who work in public federal health institutions cannot be criminalized for guaranteeing the right to abortion. This article reviews the reasons advanced by the Supreme Court to guarantee the right of reproductive self‐determination, as well as the effects of both decisions beyond the decriminalization of abortion by Mexican federal and state legislatures. The paper also examines the scope and limitations of these rulings and identifies the remaining challenges regarding voluntary abortion procedures in Mexico.
Reference22 articles.
1. SCJN.Acción de Inconstitucionalidad 148/2017. September 7 2021.
2. SCJN.Amparo en Revisión 267/2023. September 6 2023.
3. Transsexuality: Legal and ethical challenges
4. SCJN.Amparo en Revisión 1388/2015. May 15 2019.
5. SCJN.Amparo en Revisión 438/2020. July 7 2021.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献