Affiliation:
1. Department for Physics and Biophysics School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
2. Department for Medical Physics University Hospital Centre Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
3. Department for Medical Physics and Biophysics Faculty of Medicine University of Rijeka Rijeka Croatia
4. Department for Medical Physics and Radiation Protection University Hospital Centre Rijeka Rijeka Croatia
Abstract
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to calculate volume averaging correction factors for detectors used in the dosimetry of Gamma Knife's narrow photon beams, and to determine the impact of volume averaging on the field output correction factor.MethodsSimulations of different Gamma Knife fields were done using elliptical dose model formalism with newly introduced fit functions. To determine volume averaging correction factors a calculation of the absorbed dose over the volume of the detector was performed. The elliptical dose model was tested with respect to absorbed dose distribution for different volumes and compared with the calculations of Leksell GammaPlan v.11.3.1.ResultsThe largest differences in absorbed dose calculated by the elliptical model and Leksell GammaPlan are 2.25%, 1.5%, and 0.6% for 16, 8, and 4 mm field sizes, respectively. Volume averaging correction factors were determined for six ionization chambers, five semiconductor detectors, a diamond, and two plastic scintillator detectors. In general, for all examined detectors the impact of volume averaging is more pronounced for smaller field sizes. All studied ionization chambers had a larger volume than other detectors, therefore the volume averaging correction factors for ionization chambers are larger for all investigated field sizes. Besides the fact that plastic scintillator detectors can be considered tissue‐equivalent, volume averaging correction factor should be applied.ConclusionVolume averaging correction factors for different detectors are determined and suitable detectors for dosimetry of Gamma Knife's narrow photon beams are recommended. It is shown that volume averaging has a dominant contribution to a field output correction factor.
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation