Expanding on cross‐price elasticity: Understanding tobacco product demand and substitution from the cross‐price purchase task

Author:

Bono Rose S.12ORCID,White Augustus M.12ORCID,Hoetger Cosima134ORCID,Lipato Thokozeni5,Bickel Warren K.6,Cobb Caroline O.13ORCID,Barnes Andrew J.12

Affiliation:

1. Center for the Study of Tobacco Products Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA

2. Department of Health Behavior and Policy Virginia Commonwealth University School of Population Health Richmond VA USA

3. Department of Psychology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA

4. Institute for Integrative Health Care and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine Witten/Herdecke University Witten Germany

5. Department of Internal Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond VA USA

6. Addiction Recovery Research Center Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion Roanoke VA USA

Abstract

AbstractWe examine whether cigarettes serve as substitutes for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among ENDS users and demonstrate methodological extensions of data from a cross‐price purchase task to inform policies and interventions. During a clinical laboratory study, n = 19 exclusive ENDS users and n = 17 dual cigarette/ENDS users completed a cross‐price purchase task with cigarettes available at a fixed price while prices of own‐brand ENDS increased. We estimated cross‐price elasticity using linear models to examine substitutability. We defined five additional outcomes: nonzero cross‐price intensity (purchasing cigarettes if ENDS were free), constant null demand (not purchasing cigarettes at any ENDS price), cross‐product crossover point (first price where participants purchased more cigarettes than ENDS), dual‐demand score (percentage of prices where both products were purchased), and dual‐use break point (minimum relative price to force complete substitution). The cross‐price elasticity results indicated that cigarettes could serve as substitutes for ENDS among ENDS users on average, but this average effect masked substantial heterogeneity in profiles of demand (here, a measure of the drug's reinforcement potential). Policies and regulations that increase ENDS prices appear unlikely to steer most exclusive ENDS users toward cigarette use, as most would not purchase cigarettes at any ENDS price, but they could prompt some dual users to substitute cigarettes completely while others remain dual users. This heterogeneity in consumer responses suggests additional indices of cross‐product demand are useful to characterize the anticipated and unanticipated effects of tobacco price policies more fully.

Funder

Center for Tobacco Products

National Center for Research Resources

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3