Alternatives to corn for baiting wild pigs

Author:

Foster Justin A.1ORCID,Williamson Lee H.1,Kinsey John C.1,Reitz Ryan L.1,VerCauteren Kurt C.2,Snow Nathan P.2

Affiliation:

1. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 2625 FM 1340 Hunt TX 78024 USA

2. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 4101 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins CO 80521 USA

Abstract

AbstractWe examined dietary preferences of wild pigs to discern possible bait alternatives to corn. Captive trials were conducted during spring and fall 2021 in the Wild Pig Research Facility at Kerr Wildlife Management Area, Hunt, Texas, USA. We conducted 2‐choice tests by allowing wild pigs to feed ad libitum on soybeans, split peas, mealworms, and peanuts (spring 2021), and oats, acorns, earthworms, and peanuts (fall 2021), always with corn available as a second choice for reference. In each trial, we used proportion of test bait eaten versus total bait eaten, and relative access to both food sources as indices of bait preference. We found that a higher proportion of corn was consumed than that of any test bait in the spring, but not in the fall. However, we found that earthworms were consumed more than any other test bait in the fall. We also found that corn was accessed more than test baits in the spring, but not more than earthworms or peanuts in the fall. Greater consumption of earthworms relative to other baits, and access rates comparable to corn indicated that earthworms could be an effective alternative bait to corn. Our work suggests that alternative baits may be equally or more effective for attracting wild pigs than corn.

Funder

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Enhancement of poison bait acceptance through taste additives in short‐tailed mole rat (Nesokia indica) infesting datepalm orchards in Nok‐kundi and Mashkale in province Balochistan;Ahmed S. M.;Pakistan. Journal of Phytopathology and Pest Management,2017

2. Anderson W. M. R. K.Boughton S. W.Wisely M. M.Merrill E. H.Boughton M. S.Robeson andA. J.Piaggio.2018. Using DNA metabarcoding to examine wild pig (Sus scrofa) diets in a subtropical agro‐ecosystem. Proceedings of the 28th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of California Davis U.S.A.

3. Anderson V. R.Harrold D.Landblom G.Lardy B.Schatz andJ. W.Schroeder.2002. A guide to feeding field peas to livestock. North Dakota State University. . Accessed 27 Sep 2022.

4. Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states

5. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3