Affiliation:
1. Royal Roads University Victoria British Columbia Canada
2. Health Canada Vancouver British Columbia Canada
3. BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy Victoria British Columbia Canada
4. Aquatech EnviroScience Laboratories Inc. Victoria British Columbia Canada
5. Wilson Scientific Consulting Inc. Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Abstract
AbstractIn this study, we assessed the suitability of using a standard reference material (SRM) other than National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2710a or NIST 2711a in USEPA Method 1340 to determine arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) and the capabilities of Canadian‐based laboratories to perform the method. Five laboratories participated in an initial round robin study and analyzed NIST 2710a, NIST 2711a, BGS119, and Enviromat SS‐2. Intra‐ and inter‐laboratory variability were generally acceptable with percentage relative standard deviations (RSD) of less than 20%. The mean total As and Pb concentrations obtained for BGS119 (332 and 936 mg/kg, respectively) and the mean IVBA values (As = 14.3% and Pb = 78.1%) suggested it may be a suitable and acceptable SRM, whereas the concentration of As in Enviromat SS‐2 as received (3.2 mg/kg) was deemed too low. Ten soil samples from sites with varying land use were analyzed in a follow‐up round robin study using the modified IVBA method that included BGS119 as SRM. The concentrations of As and Pb in the IVBA extracts reported by the participating laboratories were comparable. The mean As IVBA values for the field‐collected samples ranged from 0.1% to 56.4%; for Pb, they ranged from 7.0% to 121%. The lowest IVBA values were measured in mine site samples; the highest values were associated with smelter‐affected soils. The low IVBA values correlated with high iron content. Intra‐ and interlaboratory reproducibility were acceptable (RSD < 30%). Based on the findings of the study, laboratories can use the modified method to provide reproducible and comparable As and Pb IVBA data. The use of BGS119 as an alternative SRM to assess contaminated sites in the province of British Columbia for regulatory purposes is recommended, as it is representative of As and Pb concentrations in contaminated soils in British Columbia. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1486–1495. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Reference23 articles.
1. British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (BC ENV). (2020).British Columbia environmental laboratory manual. Analysis Reporting and Knowledge Services Knowledge Management Branch BCENV.
2. British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (BC ENV). (2021).In vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) for arsenic and lead in soil—Prescriptive.https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/research-monitoring-and-reporting/monitoring/emre/methods/in_vitro_bioaccessibility_ivba_for_as_and_pb_in_soil_prescriptive.pdf
3. Bioaccessibility and human health risk assessment of metal(loid)s in soil from an e-waste open burning site in Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana
4. In Vivo Validation of the Unified BARGE Method to Assess the Bioaccessibility of Arsenic, Antimony, Cadmium, and Lead in Soils
5. Human health risk associated with metal exposure at Agbogbloshie e-waste site and the surrounding neighbourhood in Accra, Ghana