Initiative to reduce inappropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in an 11‐hospital safety net system: An electronic health records‐based approach

Author:

Haller Matthew D.1ORCID,Cho Hyung J.2ORCID,Ahn Jennifer13,Krouss Mona45ORCID,Alaiev Daniel5ORCID,Yoon Garrett H.6,Dunn Andrew S.4,Fagan Ian13

Affiliation:

1. NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

2. Department of Quality and Safety Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Health+Hospitals/Bellevue Hospital, Internal Medicine New York New York USA

4. Department of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA

5. Department of Quality and Safety NYC Health+Hospitals New York New York USA

6. Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Roanoke Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile pharmacologic prophylaxis has benefits for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in high‐risk patients, unnecessary use carries potential harm, including bleeding, heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia, and patient discomfort, and should be avoided in low‐risk patients. While many quality improvement initiatives aim to reduce underuse, successful models on reducing overuse are sparse in the literature.ObjectiveWe aimed to create a quality improvement initiative to reduce overuse of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis.Designs, Settings and ParticipantsA quality improvement initiative was implemented across 11 safety net hospitals in New York City.InterventionThe first electronic health record (EHR) intervention consisted of a VTE order panel that facilitated risk assessment and recommended VTE prophylaxis for high‐risk patients only. The second EHR intervention used a best practice advisory that alerted clinicians when prophylaxis was ordered for a patient previously deemed “low risk.” Prescribing rates were compared through a three‐segment interrupted time series linear regression design.ResultsCompared to the preintervention period, the first intervention did not change the rate of total pharmacologic prophylaxis immediately after implementation (1.7% relative change, p = .38) or over time (slope difference of 0.20 orders per 1000 patient days, p = .08). Compared to the first intervention period, the second intervention led to an immediate 4.5% reduction in total pharmacologic prophylaxis (p = .04) but increased thereafter (slope difference of 0.24, p = .03) such that weekly rates at the end of the study were similar to rates prior to the second intervention.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Assessment and Diagnosis,Care Planning,Health Policy,Fundamentals and skills,General Medicine,Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3