Rethinking landscape ecological risk assessment and its applicability: Counterintuitive findings from coastal areas

Author:

Liu Jianxiao1ORCID,Liu Zhewei23,Liu Xi4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Real Estate and Construction, Faculty of Architecture The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

2. Smart Cities Research Institute, Department of Land Surveying and Geo‐informatics The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong China

3. State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing Wuhan University Wuhan China

4. Shenzhen New Land Tool Planning & Architectural Design Co., Ltd Shenzhen China

Abstract

AbstractLandscape ecological risk assessment (LERA) serves as a crucial tool for guiding effective environmental management. However, the conventional approach of LERA suffers from two notable drawbacks: the utilization of low‐resolution land‐use data (e.g., 30 × 30 m) and the application of arbitrary evaluation units (e.g., uniformly‐sized grids), both of which introduce uncertainty and inaccuracies into the assessment outcomes. Moreover, the extent to which the traditional LERA accurately reflects the true ecological risk level remains unexplored. To address these limitations, this study presents a modified LERA conducted in Xiapu, a coastal county in China, spanning the years 2013–2015. Fine‐grained land‐use data were employed to overcome the shortcomings of low‐resolution data. Additionally, spatial correlations between land‐use changes and ecological risk alterations were analyzed to unravel the mechanisms behind land‐use changes' impact on ecological risk, while also testing the accuracy of LERA results. Major findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Ecological risk changes in Xiapu during 2013–2015 were relatively minor, with high‐risk areas predominantly concentrated along the coast. (2) A total of 1137 ha of land in Xiapu County experienced changes, with construction land witnessing the most substantial increase. (3) Counterintuitive and unreasonable LERA outcomes were identified, particularly pertaining to illogical ecological risk changes arising from transformations between construction and non‐construction land. (4) Based on the counterintuitive findings, potential factors affecting the limitations and applicability of LERA were discussed. This study represents the first critical examination of the limitations of LERA, offering valuable insights to stimulate future researchers to rethink LERA and emphasize the importance of validating assessment outcomes during its application.

Funder

Strategic Innovation Fund

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Soil Science,General Environmental Science,Development,Environmental Chemistry

Reference47 articles.

1. Assessing the dynamic landscape ecological risk and its driving forces in an island city based on optimal spatial scales: Haitan Island, China

2. Asafu‐Adjaye J. Blomquist L. Brand S. Brook B. W. DeFries R. Ellis E. Foreman C. Keith D. Lewis M. Lynas M. Nordhaus T. Pielke R. Pritzker R. Roy J. Sagoff M. Shellenberger M. Stone R. &Teague P.(2015).An ecomodernist manifesto.https://www.ecomodernism.org/

3. Evaluating the effects of land-use change and future climate change on vulnerability of coastal landscapes to saltwater intrusion

4. Forest Hydrology and Catchment Management

5. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Qinling Mountain

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3