Modifiability of surgical timing in postinjury multiple organ failure patients

Author:

Ting Ryan S.1ORCID,King Kate L.2ORCID,Lewis Daniel P.2ORCID,Weaver Natasha A.3ORCID,Balogh Zsolt J.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. St George & Sutherland Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute Newcastle New South Wales Australia

3. University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute Newcastle New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPostinjury multiple organ failure (MOF) is the leading cause of late trauma deaths, with primarily non‐modifiable risk factors. Timing of surgery as a potentially modifiable risk factor is frequently proposed, but has not been quantified. We aimed to compare mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS between MOF patients who had surgery that preceded MOF with modifiable timings versus those with non‐modifiable timings.MethodsRetrospective analysis of an ongoing 17‐year prospective cohort study of ICU polytrauma patients at‐risk of MOF. Among MOF patients (Denver score>3), we identified patients who had surgery that preceded MOF, determined whether the timing of these operation(s) were modifiable(M) or non‐modifiable (non‐M), and evaluated the change in physiological parameters as a result of surgery.ResultsOf 716 polytrauma patients at‐risk of MOF, 205/716 (29%) developed MOF, and 161/205 (79%) had surgery during their ICU admission. Of the surgical MOF patients, 147/161 (91%) had one or more operation(s) that preceded MOF, and 65/161 (40%) of them had operation(s) with modifiable timings. There were no differences in age (mean (SD) 52 (19) vs 53 (21)years), injury severity score (median (IQR) 34 (26–41)vs34 (25–44)), admission physiological and resuscitation parameters, between M and non‐M‐patients. M patients had longer ICU LOS (median (IQR) 18 (12–28)versus 11 (8–16)days, p < 0.0001) than non‐M‐patients, without difference in mortality (14%vs16%, p = 0.7347), or hospital LOS (median (IQR) 32 (18–52)vs27 (17–47)days, p = 0.3418). M‐patients had less fluids and transfusions intraoperatively. Surgery did not compromise patient physiology.ConclusionOperations preceding MOF are common in polytrauma and seem to be safe in maintaining physiology. The margin for improvement from optimizing surgical timing is modest, contrary to historical assumptions.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3