Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis

Published:2018-05-24 Issue:2 Volume:17 Page:196-209
ISSN:1723-8617
Container-title:World Psychiatry
language:en
Short-container-title:World Psychiatry

Author:

Davies Cathy¹,Cipriani Andrea²,Ioannidis John P.A.³⁴⁵⁶⁷,Radua Joaquim¹⁸⁹,Stahl Daniel¹⁰,Provenzani Umberto¹¹¹,McGuire Philip¹²¹³,Fusar-Poli Paolo¹¹¹¹³¹⁴

Affiliation:

1. Early Psychosis: Interventions & Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; London UK

2. Department of Psychiatry; University of Oxford, and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford UK

3. Department of Medicine; Stanford Prevention Research Center; Stanford CA USA

4. Department of Health Research and Policy; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford CA USA

5. Department of Biomedical Data Science; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford CA USA

6. Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University; Stanford CA USA

7. Department of Statistics; Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences; Stanford CA USA

8. FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries, CIBERSAM; Sant Boi de Llobregat Spain

9. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden

10. Biostatistics Department; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; London UK

11. Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences; University of Pavia; Pavia Italy

12. Department of Psychosis Studies; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; London UK

13. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre; London UK

14. OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; London UK

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Phychiatric Mental Health

Reference113 articles.

1. The clinical high-risk state for psychosis (CHR-P), Version II;Fusar-Poli;Schizophr Bull,2017

2. The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review;Fusar-Poli;JAMA Psychiatry,2013

3. Why are help-seeking subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis help-seeking?;Falkenberg;Psychiatry Res,2015

4. Specificity of incident diagnostic outcomes in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis;Webb;Schizophr Bull,2015

5. Long-term validity of the At Risk Mental State (ARMS) for predicting psychotic and non-psychotic mental disorders;Fusar-Poli;Eur Psychiatry,2017

Cited by 181 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: network meta-analyses combining evidence from randomised controlled trials and real-world data;The Lancet Psychiatry;2024-02

2. Connectome dysfunction in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis and modulation by oxytocin;Molecular Psychiatry;2024-01-19

3. Effects of Diazepam on Hippocampal Blood Flow in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis;2024-01-04

4. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to treatment as usual for at risk Mental States: The NAYAB study;Brain, Behavior, and Immunity;2024-01

5. Adverse outcome analysis in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: results from a 2-year Italian follow-up study;Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology;2023-12-13