Pain Medication and Pain Intensity Following Hip Fractures—Analyses Based on the ProFem Cohort Study

Author:

Jobski Kathrin1ORCID,Ritschel Michaela2,Pöggel‐Krämer Katja2,Anheier Daniela2,Haastert Burkhard23,Gontscharuk Veronika2,Arend Werner2,Baltes Marion45,Stephan Astrid45,Meyer Gabriele4,Klüppelholz Birgit6,Windolf Joachim7,Thelen Simon7,Jaekel Carina7,Andrich Silke28,Icks Andrea28,Hoffmann Falk1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services Research Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Oldenburg Germany

2. Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

3. mediStatistica Wuppertal Germany

4. Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty Halle (Saale) Germany

5. Department of Nursing Science Uniklinik RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany

6. Department of Health Management AOK Rheinland/Hamburg Düsseldorf Germany

7. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery University Hospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

8. Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at the Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposePain is a common symptom following proximal femoral fractures (PFF), however, information on its treatment in terms of agents and type of use (scheduled vs. pro re nata [PRN]) is scarce. The main objective of this study was to examine pain medication regimens according to pain intensity following PFF. Furthermore, we explored the utilization of medication plans.MethodsThe “ProFem”‐study on healthcare provision, functional ability, and quality of life after PFF is a German population‐based prospective cohort study based on statutory health insurance data and individually linked survey data from different time points including information on the currently used medication. This present analysis refers to the participants' baseline interviews (about 3 months following PFF) conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the participants' private surroundings.ResultsThe study population comprised 444 participants (mean age: 81.2 years, 71.0% female). Half of them reported high intensity pain, and the mean value for the EuroQol visual analogue scale was 50.8. Most commonly used analgesics were metamizole and tilidine/naloxone. Among participants with high intensity pain, 21.9% received only PRN pain medication and 17.2% no pain medication at all. Overall, 61.5% of participants presented any (printed) medication plan and only 25.2% a “federal standardized medication plan” (BMP).ConclusionAs a substantial number of patients reports high intensity pain about 3 months following a PFF, the large proportion of those receiving no or only PRN pain medication raises questions regarding the appropriateness of the therapy. The overall low utilization of the BMP indicates potential for improvement.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3