Decisional regret and impacts on quality of life following genitourinary reconstruction for neurogenic bladder: A comparison between acquired and congenital spinal cord injury

Author:

Emrich Accioly João Pedro1ORCID,Bena James2,Xiao Huijun2,Jeong Stacy1,Khouri Roger K.1,Angermeier Kenneth W.1,Dewitt‐Foy Molly1,Nemunaitis Gregory3,Wood Hadley M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA

2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA

3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPatient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary‐related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A‐SCI) and congenital (C‐SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A‐SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C‐SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.DesignIn this cross‐sectional survey study, we compared A‐SCI to C‐SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self‐reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient‐reported outcome measures.SettingParticipants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.ParticipantsThe A‐SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C‐SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Decisional Regret Scale, Short form‐ Qualiveen (SF‐Qualiveen), and Patient‐reported outcomes measurement Information system‐10 (PROMIS‐10) Global Health surveys.ResultsThe A‐SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C‐SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow‐up time. SF‐Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A‐SCI than for C‐SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with A‐SCI demonstrate lower self‐reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C‐SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self‐reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C‐SCI.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3