The Carbon Footprint of Epidural Steroid Injections: A Pilot Study

Author:

Fogarty Alexandra E.1ORCID,Wilson Annalee2,Godambe Maya2,Shinde Nidhi2,Gou Christine1,Decker Gregory1,Steensma Joe2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8233; 660 Euclid Avenue Saint Louis Missouri

2. Brown School Washington University in St. Louis, One Booking Drive, Campus Box 1196 St. Louis Missouri

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionEpidural steroid injections are common procedures in PM&R practice. However, their environmental impact has not been characterized.ObjectiveThe primary aim is to estimate and compare the carbon footprint of two standard injection kits utilized to perform epidural steroid injections at a single academic institution. Secondary objectives were 1) to create a step‐by‐step guide for estimating the carbon footprint of materials and 2) to survey physicians on practice patterns and identify areas for improvement.DesignPilot study.SettingAcademic medical center.Participants N/AInterventions N/AOutcome measuresCarbon emissions measured in CO2 equivalents (CO2 eq).MethodsUsing guidance from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GGP), the carbon footprint of the two kits was estimated by taking the sum of carbon emissions resulting from the production of the kit materials and the carbon emissions resulting from the waste disposal of the kit materials.ResultsThe carbon footprint of the transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) kit was estimated at 1.328 kg CO2 eq. The carbon footprint of the interlaminar epidural steroid injection (ILESI) kit was estimated at 2.534 kg CO2 eq. For both kits, the carbon emissions resulting from the production of the kits were greater than the emissions resulting from disposal. The survey of interventionalists performing TFESI revealed all respondents required materials in addition to those provided in the standard epidural kit. Despite this, kit materials were typically wasted in 62% of respondents.ConclusionCreating a methodology for quantifying carbon emissions is the first step to reducing carbon emissions. Once emissions are measured, the healthcare industry can determine the most effective strategies for reducing its impact. Our analysis has shown that it is feasible to perform emissions calculations and delineates a clear method with publicly available resources. Solutions to reduce epidural injection carbon footprint waste may include improved kit customization.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3