Preferences for Risks and Benefits of Treatment Outcomes for Chronic Low Back Pain: Choice‐Based Conjoint Measure Development and Discrete Choice Experiment

Author:

Wilson Leslie1,Denham Alina2,Ionova Yelena1,O'Neill Conor1,Greco Carol M.3,Hassett Afton L.4,Hanmer Janel3,Shaikh Sana5,M. Wolf1,Bervin Sigurd1,Williams David5,Ma Yanlei2,Lotz Jeffrey1,Zheng Patricia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California San Francisco San Francisco

2. Cornell University Ithaca NY

3. University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA

4. Associate Professor Anesthesiology., University of Michigan Medical School Department of Anesthesiology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive Ann Arbor MI

5. University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionUnderstanding patient preferences for chronic low back pain (cLBP) outcomes is essential for targeting available therapeutic options.ObjectiveWe developed and tested a choice‐based conjoint (CBC) measure to elicit what outcomes cLBP patients want to achieve and avoid.DesignWe developed a survey based CBC measure to allow patients to make risk/benefit trade‐off choices between possible treatment outcomes. After extensive literature, clinician, and patient input, our measure included seven attributes: fatigue, anxiety/depression, difficulty thinking/making decisions, pain intensity, physical abilities, change in pain, and ability to enjoy life despite pain. Each subject responded to 14 pairs of the same 7 attributes consisting of randomly selected levels within each attribute. Random‐parameters logit models were used to estimate strength of preferences and latent class analysis was used to identify patient characteristics associated with distinct preference.SettingOnline study using the Sawtooth™ web‐based platform.Participants211 individuals with cLBP recruited from online advertising and academic and private clinical sites.InterventionsNot applicable.ResultsThe most valued outcome was the highest level of physical activity (β=1.6–1.98;p<0.001), followed by avoiding cognitive difficulties (β=‐1.48;p<0.001). Avoidance of severe pain was comparable to avoiding constant fatigue and near‐constant depression/anxiety (β=‐0.99,‐1.02);p<0001). There was an association between preferences and current pain/disability status; patients with higher pain had a stronger preference to avoid severe pain, whereas those with higher disability stronger preferences for achieving physical activity. The latent class analysis identified two distinct groups: (1) more risk‐seeking and willing to accept worse outcomes (56%); and (2) more risk‐averse with a stronger preference for achieving maximum benefits (44%).ConclusionsOur study illuminated the heterogenous cLBP patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Patients stressed the importance of reaching high physical activity and avoiding cognitive declines, even over a desire to avoid pain. More work is needed to understand patient preferences.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3