Virtual hospital care development and deployment: A rapid qualitative study of frontline clinicians and leaders

Author:

Sakumoto Matthew1ORCID,Knees Michelle2,Rogers Kendall3,Segon Ankur4ORCID,Westergaard Sara5ORCID,Yu Amy2ORCID,Keniston Angela2,Burden Marisha2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

2. Division of Hospital Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

3. Division of Hospital Medicine University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Albuquerque Mexico USA

4. Division of Hospital Medicine University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA

5. University of Wisconsin‐Madison School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundVirtual hospitalist programs are rapidly growing in popularity due to worsening clinician shortages and increased pressure for flexible work options. These programs also have the potential to establish sustainable staffing models across multiple hospitals optimizing cost. We aimed to explore the current state of virtual hospitalist services at various health systems, challenges and opportunities that exist in providing virtual care, and future opportunities for these types of services.ObjectivesTo identify perspectives on design and implementation of virtual hospitalist programs from academic hospitalist leaders.MethodsWe conducted focus groups with United States academic hospitalist leaders. Semistructured interviews explored experiences with virtual hospitalist programs. Using rapid qualitative methods including templated summaries and matrix analysis, focus group recordings were analyzed to identify key themes.ResultsWe conducted four focus groups with 13 participants representing nine hospital systems across six geographic regions and range of experience with virtual hospital medicine care. Thematic analysis identified three themes: (1) a broad spectrum of virtual care delivery; (2) adoption and acceptance of virtual care models followed the stages of diffusion of innovation; and (3) sustainability and scalability of programs were affected by unclear finances.ConclusionsHospitalist leader perspectives revealed complex factors influencing virtual care adoption and implementation. Addressing concerns about care quality, financing, and training may accelerate adoption. Further research should clarify the best practices for sustainable models optimized for access, hospitalist experience, patient safety, and financial viability.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3