What do patients and families observe about pediatric safety?: A thematic analysis of real‐time narratives

Author:

Studenmund Christine1ORCID,Lyndon Audrey2,Stotts James R.3,Peralta‐Neel Caroline4,Sharma Anjana E.5,Bardach Naomi S.46ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA

2. Rory Meyers College of Nursing New York University New York New York USA

3. Department of Quality and Patient Safety University of California San Francisco California USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies University of California San Francisco California USA

5. Department of Family & Community Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA

6. Department of Pediatrics University of California San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesData on inpatient safety are documented by hospital staff through incident reporting (IR) systems. Safety observations from families or patients are rarely captured. The Family Input for Quality and Safety (FIQS) study created a mobile health tool for pediatric patients and their families to anonymously report safety observations in real time during hospitalization. The study objectives were to describe these observations and identify domains salient to safety.MethodsIn this observational study, we analyzed pediatric patient safety reports from June 2017 to April 2018. Participants were: English‐speaking family members and hospitalized patients ≥13 years old. The analysis had two stages: (1) assessment of whether narratives met established safety event criteria and whether there were companion IRs; (2) thematic analysis to identify domains.ResultsOf 248 enrolled participants, 58 submitted 120 narrative reports. Of the narratives, 68 (57%) met safety event criteria, while only 1 (0.8%) corresponded to a staff‐reported IR. Twenty‐five percent of narratives shared positive feedback about patient safety efforts; 75% shared constructive feedback. We identified domains particularly salient to safety: (1) patients and families as safety actors; (2) emotional safety; (3) system‐centered care; and (4) shared safety domains, including medication, communication, and environment of care. Some domains capture data that is otherwise difficult to obtain (#1–3), while others fit within standard healthcare safety domains (#4).ConclusionsPatients and families observe and report salient safety events that can fill gaps in IR data. Healthcare leaders should consider incorporating patient and family observations—collected with an option for anonymity and eliciting both positive and constructive comments.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3